PAGE LINKS

"Return to Home Page"

"APFTE Intro Page"

"APFTE Beliefs"

"APFTE Archives"

"Five Minutes Of Reality"

"Immigration"

"Links page"

"Memorable Quotes"

"Opinions"

"Right To Defend"

"What is Racism"

"US Constitution"

"Bill of Rights"

"Declaration of Independence"

 

"Civil rights laws were not passed to protect the rights of White Men and do not apply to them."     PAGE LINK

 


 

 

 MEDIA IGNORING HORRIFICALLY GRUESOME DOUBLE TORTURE & SLAUGHTER... WHY?
This is a picture of Channon Christian and Chris Newsom. They're both dead... 

  They were both brutally raped, mutilated and murdered in Knoxville, Tennessee this year. You probably didn't hear about it because the accused murderers are these five Black Racist Scumbags. 

 The animals pictured above "allegedly" raped Christopher Newsom, cut off his penis, set him on fire and fatally shot him several times while they forced his girlfriend, Channon Christian, to watch it happen. 

An even more cruel fate awaited her...

Channon Christian, was beaten and gang-raped in many ways for four days by all of them, while they took turns urinating on her. Then they cut off her breast and put chemicals in her mouth supposedly to destroy any DNA evidence from their semen, then murdered her.  Seems like the only thing they didn't do was necklace her with a burning tire...

The mainstream media coverage of these murders have been glaringly absent from network television and nationwide newspapers. What coverage is available is watered down with legalese and charges.  (If five racist whites tortured two young black people to death it would be all over the news.)

The coverage neglects to tell America how brutally and senselessly these young people were murdered.

The Mainstream Media will show us the hanging of Saddam Hussein and the beheading of Nick Berg when it aids their political propaganda, but they won't show or even tell us about the atrocities that were committed by 5 black "youths" on two white youths.

Why not? 

Is reporting black on white crime politically incorrect? 

You better believe it is!  

It's the racial double standards in action again...  

The media in the US and most white, western-European counties no longer performs its job of "reporting the news. Instead, they propagandize. They are extremely selective about which stories they report and even more selective in HOW those stories are reported.

The news coverage today done by the major networks is specifically designed to shape and mold your view of the world; to manipulate the way you perceive things and how you think. This story is absolute proof.

Remember back in 1998, when three evil white racists in Jasper, Texas chained a black man, James Byrd, Jr. to the back of a pick-up truck and dragged him three miles to his death? 

Sure you do! 

We all do! 

That's because the mainstream media covered the story for weeks at a time. They never let up with the "white against black hate stories." 

Yet here we are in 2007, five blacks are guilty of a far more hateful crime against two whites and barely a word out of the media. 

Call your local TV station and ask them why they aren't covering this story. Point out how much they covered the James Byrd, Jasper, TX dragging death and demand they provide equal coverage of this "racist hate crime" against two innocent white kids. 

Below are additional details about this gruesome story and the perpetrators from WVLT-TX in Knoxville, TN:

Knoxville (WVLT) - The District Attorney General of Knox County announced the list of charges facing now five suspects in the double murder of Channon Christian and Christopher Newsom.

The District Attorney General Randy Nichols is not saying whether or not he will seek the death penalty, but he does say the state will seek conviction for all charges filed in a 24-page indictment from the Knox County Grand Jury.

Lemaricus Davidson, 25, faces a total of 46 charges. Davidson was indicted on 16 counts of Felony Murder growing out of rape, robbery kidnapping and theft of Channon Christian and Chris Newsom, 2 counts premeditated murder of Christian and Newsom, 2 counts especially aggravated robberies from Christian and Newsom, 4 counts especially aggravated kidnapping of Christian and Newsom, 20 counts aggravated rape of Christian and Newsom, and 2 counts of theft from Christian and Newsom.

Letalvis Cobbins, 24, faces a total of 46 charges. Cobbins was indicted on 16 counts of Felony Murder growing out of rape, robbery kidnapping and theft of Channon Christian and Chris Newsom, 2 counts premeditated murder of Christian and Newsom, 2 counts especially aggravated robberies from Christian and Newsom, 4 counts especially aggravated kidnapping of Christian and Newsom, 20 counts aggravated rape of Christian and Newsom, and 2 counts of theft from Christian and Newsom.

George Thomas, 24, faces a total of 46 charges. Thomas was indicted on 16 counts of Felony Murder growing out of rape, robbery kidnapping and theft of Channon Christian and Chris Newsom, 2 counts premeditated murder of Christian and Newsom, 2 counts especially aggravated robberies from Christian and Newsom, 4 counts especially aggravated kidnapping of Christian and Newsom, 20 counts aggravated rape of Christian and Newsom, and 2 counts of theft from Christian and Newsom.

Just last night, police in Lebanon, Kentucky, arrested 18-year-old Vanessa Coleman. She faces 40 Tennessee state charges. Coleman was indicted on 12 counts Felony Murder growing out of rape, robbery kidnapping and theft of Channon Christian and Chris Newsom, 1 count Premeditated Murder of Christian only, 1 count Especially Aggravated Robbery of Newsom only, 4 counts especially aggravated kidnapping of Christian and Newsom, 20 counts of aggravated rape of Christian and Newsom and 2 Counts of theft from Christian and Newsom.

Eric Boyd, 24, also arrested in connection with the fatal carjacking, only faces federal charges as an accessory after the fact. He was not indicted by Knox county grand jury.

Felony Murder carries a possibility of death, life without the possibility of parole and life with parole. Especially Aggravated Robbery is a Class A felony that carries a possibility of 15 to 60 years in prison. Aggravated Rape is a Class A felony that carries a possibility of 15 to 60 years of prison.

At a news conference Thursday, Nichols commended the cooperative efforts between several departments and credits that cooperation for the fast pace this case is moving through the court system.

Nichols says he hopes to move the case to trial on the first day it's set. The four are expected to make their first court appearance within ten to fifteen days.

This is certainly a case getting a lot of public interest, Nichols recognizes that and says he expects all kinds of requests filed in this case, including a change of venue in order to receive a fair trial. But he says he does hope 12 Knox County jurors will be able to determine the guilt or innocence of these suspects.

Where is the national media? 

Where are the protestors?

Where are the bleeding heart Liberals?

Where are the usual race hustlers that jump on a story like this if it happens to be a black victim they can get some camera time because of?  

Where's the "Jessie and Al" sideshow of outrage when a crime like this needs to be brought into the public spotlight?  Nowhere to be seen yet, because it was only white people slaughtered tortured and killed, not one of "their own kind". 

Write or call your local news sources and ask them why this story is being ignored everywhere except on the internet.

As one person commented:

"Why isn’t this story all over the national news? One black stripper accuses white men of rape and it’s all over the news. A white couple is murdered in a savage manner and not a peep out of the liberal news!"

      This is just one story from the many incidents yearly of black on white hate crime across our nation that isn't reported by the drive by media... Lock your car doors while traveling anywhere, and beware of criminals that may decide to "car-jack" then torture you before murdering you.  APFTE

Additional information included from the APFTE

More info here LINK


The Newsom Family comments...

Volunteer TV spoke with Christopher's family on Monday who say even four and a half months later...losing their son is still no easier to deal with.

"He just really enjoyed life and that's what hurts so bad that his life was taken away and he was way too young for that," Mary Newsom says.

As Chris Newsom's parents imagine what may have happened one fateful day in January...

"I sit in that chair at night and look over at that picture and I just cry... tears roll down my cheeks... I think of what they did to him... him just laying there burned," Mary says.

They lean on each other... reading each other's thoughts... finishing the other's sentences...

"Both of them suffered... tremendously... they had to... in their last hours of life," Hugh & Mary Newsom say.

As they support each other... they are also supporting a promise they both made to Chris in death.

"I would be present when any one of those animals made their appearance. I would be there to represent him and I intend to keep that promise," Hugh says.

But they say even justice won't help them heal completely.

"We're all trying to get through this and recover, but there's not gonna be any closure," Mary says.

They receive love, prayers and support from every direction... they also say they knew Chris died trying to protect his soulmate Channon Christian.

"He was so much in love with her. That compounds our loss," Hugh says.

"He had golfed all that day and came home to change... and had a big smile on his face when he came down the stairs and we knew he had a date with her," Mary says.

But her family, Channon Christian's family, helps them heal...

"They're the only ones who can really understand the way we feel, because they know we feel the same way," Mary says.

And the Newsom's find a different strength in their own family...

"We have three other children and grandchildren and we have to go on for them," Hugh says.

With each day that passes... Chris's memory lives on in the Newsom home... through pictures... through smiles... through the many, many, memories.

"He was either at the golf course, or he was out fishing or he was playing tennis... or with Channon," Mary says.

Now they believe he's with Channon... and will be forever.

The Newsom family asks for your prayers, support, even from those they don't know, is helping them heal.

LINK to article

 


Atrocity in America

Article by Sean Sullivan

This is an atrocity!  

This is the perfect example of the priorities in this country today.
Everyday we come home to turn on the television and see that Anna Nicole Smith has died. Every station, every broadcast, every topic is of how she died and who is the father of her illegitimate child.

That's right folks, a stripper takes precedent over brutal torture and racist actions. 
What the hell is going on? Our swayed media is so caught up on what's 'TV' savvy, that they leave out the horrible injustices that are taking place in our country.

The torture of the two Americans from Tennessee has not hit the national news with the hailstorm of the likes of Britney Spears shaving her head. Who cares? They do, the media. Because Britney sells. Two brutalized white kids from Tennessee won't make the media money.

There is without a question, that if a group of white people tortured two black kids to the extent that would have involved verbal abuse alone. The major networks would have been all over it. But some liberal out there is justifying their actions. Saying it is because of black rage, or their ancestors were slaves...

The truth is, that the blacks were taught to hate whites by other blacks. The media won't pick it up because its "taboo" nowadays to talk about black violence against whites. The race mongers can't make any money off of it! 

Quiet! Listen! Shhhhh! Anyone hear Al, Jesse, Louis Farrakhan ranting about this incident as an injustice? Nope, I don't hear a thing! 

Something has to be done! We must not stand for this! Caucasians in this country are becoming so apologetic for their very existence that liberal guilt is being taught, NO, forced upon them in the mainstream schools and media.

Every day whites teach their children not to see color. Not to be conscience of race or creed. Whites teach their children to see the person. To judge only by the actions of a person. Blacks in this county teach their children that they are victims and they should protest and "get theirs". 

Everyday I see blacks wearing T- shirts that say; "100% Black" and "Black by popular demand". If I was to wear a shirt that said "White boys rule" or "White is right" I would be classified as a racist hate monger who is ignorant and a member of the Ku Klux Klan. This double standard has to stop! But I wouldn't wear such a shirt. Why? Because I don't think that way. I wasn't raised to think that way. I don't think because of my skin color that I am better than anyone else.

These perpetrators must be held publicly accountable. They must pay the ultimate penalty, as would anyone, who would have committed such a horrendous crime.

But whites in this country have become too passive. Its easier to just turn the other cheek and say "Oh, let them spew misguided facts, I don't want conflict"  Well guess what!  You have conflict now, and something better be done soon!

Equality? What does that mean anymore? We have jostled the system so much with set-asides and preferential treatment to ease our self indulged quilt, that we can't define equality anymore.

I hear "talk" every day about slave ships, horrible treatment and oppression. The month of February is Black History Month. 

Well, why isn't the month of March Irish history month?

The Irish were starved off of their own lands, forced upon ships, starved to death, beaten, spat upon and made to become slaves by the same people who oppressed the Africans - the English and Dutch colonist, which only 1 in 500 people owned slaves. The keepers of slaves today are native black Africans. Keeping other black Africans! Its horrible, I attest!

If you were a black male during the mid 1800's in great physical shape you were worth about $350.00 a lot of money for the time! You were taken care of, clothed, housed and fed. After all, who is going to purchase an investment then mistreat it? But because of the media "The great Levar Burton" in Roots, we think that all slaves were were beaten and every white person owned one. 

In New Orleans alone, a major slave city, 13% of the slave owners were black!  But you won't hear that being taught in schools.

If you were an Irish male in great physical condition, in the mid 1800's, you were worth nothing. You were greeted with a sign that said, "Die, MICK, Die!" or "Help wanted Irish need not apply", "Go Home Mick! Go Home!".

But, what did the Irish do? They did what every other race in this country did! They fought for jobs, educated themselves, became Presidents and executives of corporations. NO ONE gave them a damn thing because they were oppressed by Englishmen. You don't hear them whining constantly. My ancestors never owned anyone. They never oppressed anyone. I will not apologize to anyone for anything! My taxes already pay for public housing, schools, food, grants, transportation...

I am the son of LEGAL Irish /Scots immigrants and I have yet to see special treatment! I don't want special treatment. I will not raise my children to think that they are entitled to anything, except air!

You want it, work for it. Because no one owes you a damn thing! 

This land of entitlement must stop! My parents came here and devoted their lives to America, all America! Not a divided country as is in Ireland and Scotland. They are the living embodiment of what America is supposed to stand for.

The Liberal media in this country IS the contributing factor to the down fall of race relations.
Hard working blacks, true Americans, that are devoted to this country and the prospering for future generations need to stand up and fight for what's right! Because, whites in this country have become too passive. 

Whites have laid the ground work for the elimination of their own race. (See the Rev. Jesse L. Peterson's article on Hurricane Katrina).

We must all stand together if we are to have "One Nation Under God, indivisible, with Liberty and Justice for ALL"! Whites, Blacks and any other color that live in America.

Remember, There is NO word in front of American. 

By Sean M. Sullivan 


 

The Truth of Interracial Rape in the United States 

Like Ahab's search for the Great White Whale, liberals' search for the Great White Defendant is relentless and never-ending. 

When, in 1988, Tawana Brawley's and Al Sharpton's then year-old spectacular charge that several white men including prosecutor Steven Pagones (whose name Brawley had picked out of a newspaper article) had abducted and raped the 15 year old was shown to be completely false, the Nation said it didn't matter, since the charges expressed the essential nature of white men's treatment of black women in this country. 

When the Duke University lacrosse players were accused of raping a black stripper last year, liberals everywhere treated the accusation as fact, because, just as with the Nation and Tawana Brawley, the rape charge seemed to the minds of liberals to reflect the true nature of oppressive racial and sexual relations in America. 

To see the real truth of the matter, let us take a look at the Department of Justice document Criminal Victimization in the United States, 2005. (Go to the linked document, and under "Victims and Offenders" download the file for 2005.) 

In Table 42, entitled "Personal crimes of violence, 2005, percent distribution of single-offender victimizations, based on race of victims, by type of crime and perceived race of offender," we learn that there were 111,590 white victims and 36,620 black victims of rape or sexual assault in 2005. (The number of rapes is not distinguished from those of sexual assaults; it is maddening that sexual assault, an ill-defined category that covers various types of criminal acts ranging from penetration to inappropriate touching, is conflated with the more specific crime of rape.) 

In the 111,590 cases in which the victim of rape or sexual assault was white, 44.5 percent of the offenders were white, and 33.6 percent of the offenders were black. 

In the 36,620 cases in which the victim of rape or sexual assault was black, 100 percent of the offenders were black, and 0.0 percent of the offenders were white. The table explains that 0.0 percent means that there were under 10 incidents nationally. 

The table does not give statistics for Hispanic victims and offenders. But the bottom line on interracial white/black and black/white rape is clear: 


"In the United States in 2005, 37,460 white females were sexually assaulted or raped by a black man, while between zero and ten black females were sexually assaulted or raped by a white man. 

What this means is that every day in the United States, over one hundred white women are raped or sexually assaulted by a black man." 

The Department of Justice statistics refer, of course, to verified reports. According to the Wikipedia article on rape, as many as half of all rape charges nationally are determined by police and prosecutors to be false: 

Linda Fairstein, former head of the New York County District Attorney's Sex Crimes Unit, noted, "There are about 4,000 reports of rape each year in Manhattan. Of these, about half simply did not happen.... It's my job to bring justice to the man who has been falsely accused by a woman who has a grudge against him, just as it's my job to prosecute the real thing." 

No wonder there was such absolute belief in the guilt of the Duke students among the leading sectors of liberal America.  A drug-addled, half-deranged, promiscuous black stripper accused three young white men of raping her. 

There are virtually zero rapes of black women by white men in the United States, and half of all rape charges against specific individuals turn out to be false. But in the agnostic, inverted world of liberal demonology, the white students had to be guilty. 

Meanwhile, in the real America, week after week, the newspapers report the rapes of white women by black men—though, of course, without ever once using the words, "a white woman was raped by black man." 

Just last week in the New York Post there was a story about a serial black rapist who invaded women's apartments on Manhattan's Upper West Side; you knew the rapist was black from a police drawing accompanying the story, and you knew the victims were most likely white from the neighborhoods where the attacks occurred. But even when news media's reports of black on white rape make the race of the perpetrator evident (which the media only does in a minority of instances), no explicit reference is ever made to the racial aspect of the case. Each story of black on white rape is reported in isolation, not presented as part of a larger pattern. There is never the slightest mention of the fact that white women in this country are being targeted by black rapists. 

In the inverted world of liberalism, the phenomenon does not exist. 

By Lawrence Auster May 3, 2007

Lawrence Auster is the author of Erasing America: The Politics of the Borderless Nation. He offers a traditionalist conservative perspective at View from the Right. Article Link


 
 
 
 
For Non-Whites Only
By Terence J. Pell
FrontPageMagazine.com | September 27, 2006

When fifteen-year old Emily Smith applied to Virginia Commonwealth University ’s Urban Journalism Workshop last April, she didn’t think her experience would become the basis for a new federal lawsuit designed to crack down on the illegal use of racial exclusions by colleges and universities.

But neither did she expect a phone call from one of the program directors inquiring about her race -- after she had been admitted to the program.  When she said that she was “white,” the director immediately rescinded her acceptance.  “I’m sorry,” she was told, “but you can’t come.”

It turned out that the Urban Journalism Workshop is one of dozens sponsored each year by the Dow Jones Newspaper Fund, a philanthropic arm of the publisher of the Wall Street Journal and other publications.  Since it started the program in 1967, the Dow Jones Fund has required that participants be black, Hispanic, Asian, American Indian or Alaskan native.

 

There was little way Emily could have known the program was racially segregated, since the application materials no where asked her to indicate her race.  Moreover, it wasn’t until she received that phone call a few weeks before the program was to begin that she learned that the program discriminated on the basis of skin color. And so, while Emily Smith met every other requirement of the program (and even was accepted), she couldn’t attend solely because she was the wrong race.

 

Yesterday, Smith filed suit against VCU, the Dow Jones Newspaper Fund and the Richmond Times Dispatch -- the three program sponsors.  In addition, her suit names the individual officials responsible for establishing and operating the workshop in a plainly discriminatory manner.  She is represented in this effort by my organization, the Center for Individual Rights, which has challenged racially exclusionary admissions policies at other public colleges, including most notably the University of Michigan .

 

Smith seeks a legal ruling that programs that exclude individuals solely because of their race and for no other reason are unconstitutional.  Unlike racially preferential admissions policies in which race is one factor used to ensure classroom diversity, the Urban Journalism Workshop excludes individuals solely on the basis of race and without considering any other factor.  Moreover, a 100% racial quota does not make the classroom more diverse -- it does just the reverse.

 

Most schools, including the likes of Princeton University, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Harvard Business School , have ended race exclusive programs.  And in February 2006, Southern Illinois University acceded to threatened legal action by the U.S. Department of Justice and entered into a consent decree obligating it to end several racially exclusive graduate programs.

 

Though it is laudable for philanthropic organizations, state universities and others to make efforts to bring individuals with varied backgrounds and diverse viewpoints into professions such as journalism, the time is long past when race can be used as the sole measure of diversity. 

 

Programs that segregate students by race don't encourage students to challenge racial stereotypes.  Indeed, a race-exclusive admissions policy reinforces the idea that it is appropriate to set aside the rules for certain racial groups.  It is but a short step from that principle to the rather more malignant idea that some races just can’t compete on the same level as everyone else.  These programs aren’t meant to be harmful, but they produce harmful consequences just the same.  It is time to put an end to them.

 


Funding Racist Schools: Your Tax Dollars At Work

By Michelle Malkin

Top White House adviser Karl Rove traveled to Los Angeles this week to pay homage to the anti-immigration enforcement lobbying group for Latinos: the National Council of La Raza.

"La Raza" is Spanish for "The Race."

It's bad enough the White House lent its prestige to The Race's annual conference. But did you know the Bush administration has forked over millions of federal tax dollars directly to The Race?

According to GOP Rep. Charlie Norwood of Georgia, The Race snapped up $15.2 million in federal grants last year alone and more than $30 million since 1996. Undisclosed amounts went to get-out-the-vote efforts supporting La Raza political positions. The U.S. Department of Education funneled nearly $8 million in taxpayer grants to the group for a nationwide charter-schools initiative.

Among The Race's most infamous government-funded charter schools is La Academia Semillas del Pueblo, the Los Angeles public school that teaches "Aztec math" (ancient dot math is the new math) and the Mexican indigenous language of "Nahuatl." 

The ethnic separatist principal of the school, Marcos Aguilar, told a sympathetic UCLA interviewer:
"We don't want to drink from a white water fountain; we have our own wells and our natural reservoirs and our way of collecting rain in our aqueducts. We don't need a white water fountain. ... We are not interested in what they have because we have so much more and because the world is so much larger. And ultimately, the white way, the American way, the neo-liberal, capitalist way of life will eventually lead to our own destruction."

That's the tip of the iceberg. I found dozens of other publicly subsidized charter schools sponsored by The Race and funded with our money, including:

* Aztlan Academy in Tucson, Ariz. According to The Race, the school's success rests on "Aztlan's ability to integrate a meaningful Chicano Studies program into their lives, language and academics, as a means of developing their intellects as well as their pride and self-esteem." The school's name – a reference to a mythical swath of the vast Southwestern U.S. expanse, which Latino activists claim is their rightful homeland and which they seek to reconquer for Mexico – says it all.

* Mexicayotl Academy in Nogales, Ariz. Who needs the three Rs? At Mexicayotl, it's all about the three Ms: me, me, me! The school's program is "structured and developed around the concepts of identity, culture and language." Second mission: supporting local ethnic lobbying efforts "to right social injustices by educating the community and helping create social change." Under "greatest achievements," the school's website lists its participation in a "Peace and Dignity Run"; its visit from Rigoberta Menchu (the Marxist academic fraud from Guatemala who lied her way to a Nobel Peace Prize); and its sponsorship of the local annual Dia de los Muertos (the Mexican holiday).

* The Dolores Huerta Preparatory High School in Pueblo, Colo. It's named after the far-left Latina labor union activist who recently railed that "Republicans hate Latinos," praised illegal-alien marchers and screeched that "We didn't cross the borders, the borders crossed us" in a hate-filled tirade before Arizona students.

* Academia Cesar Chavez Charter School in St. Paul, Minn. Board of Directors member Louis Mendoza, an activist Chicano Studies professor, pushed the school to lobby for the federal DREAM Act (providing in-state tuition discounts to illegal-alien students not available to legal non-residents). The school's website features one flag on its front page: the Mexican flag.

The White House will tell you that the National Council of The Race is a "moderate," mainstream civil-rights group. But there's nothing "moderate" about The Race's advocacy of driver's licenses and in-state tuition discounts for illegal aliens. Or its opposition to strengthening security for identity documents and improving cooperation on immigration enforcement between state, local and federal enforcement immigration officials. Or its all-out war on the House GOP's border security and enforcement-first bill passed last December.

President Bush pays lip service to immigration enforcement and assimilation, while the White House sends Karl Rove to make nice with the separatist leaders of The Race and the Bush Education Department showers our tax dollars on radical Reconquista schools. 

It doesn't add up.

Unless, of course, you're using Aztec math. 



By Michelle Malkin  Visit Michelle's website soon!


 

Just What Exactly Is Racism?

Here's A Perfect Example.

(QUOTE) "...and they’re monitoring our people to try to prevent the one person from coming up with the one idea.  And the one idea is, how we are going to exterminate white people?"

  Link To Racist's Video Taped Speech

"Because that, in my estimation, is the only conclusion I have come to. We have to exterminate white people off of the face of the planet to solve this problem." 

Now that's what the APFTE calls a racist remark!

 If A White person would have made the same statement about Blacks or another Minority they would be accused of Hate Speech by every News Agency in our land and condemned by every Commentator and Black Race Hustler In America.  Jessie Jackass and Al Sharpie possibly the two biggest Race Hustlers of them all, would be considering busing paid Protesters into the home town of the accused... just to make things miserable for the person. 

Why wasn't this Black Racist Hitler accused of hate speech by everyone for going so far as to encourage murder on a mass scale?  Will he be responsible if some listener and admirer of his decides to go on a killing spree?  That type of racist thug, Hitler stylized hate speech is capable of inciting others into domestic Terrorism.  Why can some people get away with saying those seditious remarks and others not?  

Because of their skin color... and our justice system turns a blind eye to seditious hate speech if it's not a "European-American" or White American person committing it.

Can you say "Double Standards?"

Go ahead, say it... "Double Standards"... That's how genocide or what some call "ethnic cleansing" begins with, Double Standards.  So, in reality, double standards is racism and our Government is condoning it!  Nice eh?  

Think about it...

Rick Smith, APFTE


 

Visit "Extremism In America" For A Real Eye-Opener On Hate Groups In America, Hate Isn't Practiced By Any Single Racial group. 

 


 

It's discrimination... 

It's wrong! 


By Sharon L. Browne

When Crystal Meredith of Louisville tried to enroll her young son in Bloom Elementary School, she was told he couldn't transfer out of Young Elementary, the school where he was already assigned.

Why? Not because of his grades or interests. It was because he is white. As a federal district court later recounted the facts, he "was denied admittance because his transfer to Bloom would have had an adverse effect on Young's racial composition."

Did this happen in 1950, when students were routinely barred from certain schools on grounds of skin color? No, it was 2002. Called "managed choice," the race-based policy is the district's attempt to achieve the so-called "right" racial balance of students, ensuring that schools have at least 15% African-American students and no more than 50% African-American students.

Not surprisingly, Ms. Meredith objected to her son being turned away from a public school because of his skin color. She filed suit, arguing that he had been denied his equal protection rights under the U.S. Constitution.

This month, the U.S. Supreme Court sent a hopeful message when it agreed to hear this case and a similar one brought by Seattle parents, setting the stage for a decision on the constitutionality of these practices.

Some say these race-based policies are about diversity. They're not. They amount to blatant and illegal racial discrimination.

Sadly, Louisville and Seattle school administrators aren't alone. Nearly 1,000 school districts today are using race-based policies to assign students.

Supporters of these policies say that getting a balance of different races in each school can help the academic performance of minority kids. That claim is questionable.

Judges opposing Seattle's race-based assignments cited this passage from a report co-authored by George Mason University social scientist David Armor: "... racial composition by itself has little effect on raising the achievement of minority students or on reducing the minority-white achievement gap. Some studies show that there is no relationship at all between black achievement and racial composition ... and other studies show that there is no relationship between the black-white achievement gap and racial composition."

The high court's decision to take these cases is particularly important since lower courts have misapplied prior decisions involving higher education institutions, using those rulings to wrongly justify discriminatory practices in K-12 public schools.

The court has repeatedly made a clear distinction between universities and their academic freedom to exchange ideas and K-12 public schools where students are required to attend. Further, the court has said that race cannot be the sole factor in categorizing students, yet the Louisville and Seattle K-12 schools have used race mechanically.

In 2003, the Supreme Court rejected the University of Michigan's undergraduate admissions point formula that was even less racially focused than the systems in Louisville and Seattle, where students have been assigned to schools solely based on their color.

More than 50 years after the landmark Brown v. Board of Education decision, our nation's justices can put an end to government-ordered discrimination policies.

In 2006, decades after the civil rights movement, no one in America should be judged by skin color. That's a message that everyone, from school administrators to children, needs to hear.

Sharon L. Browne is a principal attorney with the Pacific Legal Foundation, a non-profit, public-interest organization based in Sacramento that filed briefs in both cases before the Supreme Court.
By Sharon L. Browne

Article Link

APFTE Note:  Typical double standards like the one above have to be corrected before our society is torn apart even more than it already is.  Fair is fair, discrimination is discrimination.  It seems simple enough to figure out, but not for Citizens that want special treatment.  

Equal Rights For ALL, Special Privileges For None! 


 

 

 


“I am absolutely sick and tired of having to have my appearance at the White House validated by white people,” Cynthia McKinney.

Cynthia McKinney...  Race hustler extraordinaire!

McKinney Accuses Capitol Police of 'Inappropriate Touching'
By Randy Hall
CNSNews.com Staff Writer/Editor
March 31, 2006

(CNSNews.com) - Rep. Cynthia McKinney (D-Ga.) claimed Friday that an altercation involving her and a Capitol Police officer two days earlier was "instigated by the inappropriate touching and stopping of me, a female black Congresswoman."

During a press conference at Howard University in Washington, D.C., McKinney said she had been advised by her attorneys not to discuss the facts of the case. "I deeply regret that this incident occurred," she said, "and I am certain that after a full review of the facts, I will be exonerated."

The six-term member of the U.S. House of Representatives was accompanied by her lawyer, James W. Myart, Jr., who claimed his client was "just a victim of being in Congress while black.

"Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney, like thousands of average Americans across this country, is, too, a victim of the excessive use of force by law enforcement officials because of how she looks and the color of her skin," Myart said.

McKinney and Myart were surrounded by a small crowd of supporters, including several schoolchildren who happened to be in Washington, D.C., for a field trip. Also present were actor Danny Glover and singer Harry Belafonte, both of whom are regularly involved in political activism.

Regarding the Georgia Democrat, Glover stated "she alone has stood up for issues that are important to this country and important to the world. We're not here to judge the merits of the case. We're here to support our sister."

"In America and Washington, D.C., issues of race have always been at play and have often been central to justice miscarried," Belafonte stated. "We're here to be sure that this process is handled fairly and is not rooted in a familiar racist behavior, that the outcome of this is going to be done on a very fair and a very square basis."

As Cybercast News Service previously reported, the incident took place at about 2:30 p.m. on Wednesday, as McKinney entered the Longworth House Office Building.

When she tried to bypass a metal detector, the six-term congresswoman -- who was not wearing the lapel pin that enables members of Congress to enter and exit the building freely -- was stopped by an officer with the Capitol Police.

The officer reportedly put his hand on McKinney's arm to get her attention, and she reacted by striking him in the chest.

"I was urgently trying to get to an important meeting on time to fulfill my obligations to my constituents," McKinney said later in a statement on her website. "Unfortunately, the police officer did not recognize me as a member of Congress, and a confrontation ensued. ... I deeply regret that the incident occurred."

On Thursday, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said she "wouldn't make a big deal" out of the confrontation, which she called a "mistake" that happened because of the "unfortunate lack of recognition of a member of Congress."

Nevertheless, rumors began to circulate around Washington that McKinney might be charged with a crime for hitting the officer, so the Georgia Democrat scheduled a press conference for Friday.

Myart also responded to the rumors by telling reporters he was considering filing charges against the officer for using "excessive force" while confronting his client.

"Congresswoman McKinney, in a hurry, was essentially chased and grabbed by the officer," Myart said. "She reacted instinctively in an effort to defend herself."

However, at least one Republican could not resist commenting on the congresswoman's decision to attend the press conference with Glover.

"Rep. McKinney appearing with the star of 'Lethal Weapon?' Not exactly the message you want to be sending," said Ron Bonjean, spokesman for House Speaker Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.).

See Earlier Stories:
McKinney: 'I Was Rushing to an Important Meeting...' (March 30, 2006)
Hitting a Police Officer 'No Big Deal?' Republicans Ask (March 31, 2006)

mckinney_racecard.gif (40860 bytes)

 

Capitol Police Chief Speaks About McKinney Altercation
By Jeff Johnson

CNSNews.com Senior Staff Writer
April 04, 2006

(CNSNews.com) - The chief of the U.S. Capitol Police is speaking out, for the first time, about the altercation between one of his officers and Rep. Cynthia McKinney. 

The Georgia Democrat claims a police officer's decision to stop her after she walked past a security checkpoint without identifying herself last week was racially motivated, but Capitol Police Chief Terrance Gainer said Tuesday evening that the officer was just doing his job.

"When there's a crush of people at the door, things can get hectic there and the officers are taught to take control of the door, slow things down and make sure that you know who's coming in and what they may be bringing in or not," Gainer told WTTG television reporter Will Thomas. "And I believe that's all this officer was trying to do."

As Cybercast News Service reported last week, McKinney claimed the incident was instigated, not as part of the officer's duty to secure the Longworth House Office Building, but by the officer's racism as evidenced by his "inappropriate touching and stopping of me, a female black Congresswoman."

McKinney claimed that she was "urgently trying to get to an important meeting on time to fulfill my obligations to my constituents.

"Unfortunately, the police officer did not recognize me as a member of Congress, and a confrontation ensued," McKinney said in a statement on her website.

While McKinney said she "deeply regret[s] that the incident occurred," she has not apologized for allegedly striking the officer, who reportedly took hold of her arm when she refused multiple verbal requests to stop and identify herself. Gainer said Tuesday night that the officer was only trying to confirm that McKinney indeed was authorized to bypass the security checkpoint.

"That's simply the case. I think 99 percent of the members of Congress slow down and let themselves be recognized," Gainer explained. "This is a case in which the officer didn't recognize the member and simply took the next prudent procedure."

Capitol Police referred the investigation to the U.S. Attorney's Office late Monday. The Associated Press cited unnamed sources as confirming that the police department responsible for protecting the U.S. Capitol complex, staff, visitors and members of Congress is seeking an arrest warrant for McKinney. A statement issued by the Capitol Police did not mention those reports.

"Last week, there was an incident involving Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney (D-GA) and a United States Capitol Police Officer," the statement said. "The United States Capitol Police has referred its investigative findings to the United States Attorney."

McKinney had previously stated that "I am certain that after a full review of the facts, I will be exonerated." Congressional offices were closed and, therefore, no one from McKinney's staff was available for comment when Gainer's remarks were broadcast.

Article Link

Congresswoman representing the 4th District of Georgia, DeKalb County 
Member of the radical Progressive Caucus 
Voted to legalize the killing of babies after they are born 
Voted against a resolution supporting Israel in the War on Terror, but refused to vote for a resolution condemning the anti-Semitic statements of a disciple of Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan 
Told a Saudi prince she would accept his offer of $10 million that New York Mayor Rudi Giuliani rejected because it came with anti-Semitic strings attached 
Provided propaganda for Communist FARC guerrillas in Colombia 
Voted against school vouchers for black parents in Washington, D.C. 


MORE ARTICLES AND INFO AT THIS LINK.. Click


 

"I Pledge Allegiance To My Black People"


         
One of the nation's fastest-rising poetry prodigies is a 7-year-old New York girl whose poisonous demagogic advocacy of black separatism makes Al Sharpton look like Mister Rogers.

Autum Ashante' of Mount Vernon, N.Y., has performed at HBO's Def Poetry Jam, The Cotton Club in L.A., The Apollo Theater in Harlem, the African Street Festival, Caroline's on Broadway, the Russell Simmons Phat Farm Fashion Show, Steve Harvey's "Big Time," a prestigious Grammy Foundation event, and at universities and other venues across the country. She recites her verses not only in English, but also in fluent Swahili and Arabic (she attended the Islamic Darul Arkam School in Mount Vernon).

Autum has appeared at a tribute to black nationalist Marcus Garvey, America-bashing 9/11 conspiracy-monger Amiri Baraka's annual family cookout and the extremist New Black Panther Party's Million Youth March.

INFO LINK ON The New Black Panther Party

(APFTE NOTE: The Racist Black Panther Party is responsible for at least 11 Police Officers being Murdered in the past. Ignorant Chicago City Councilwoman Madeline Haithcock has sponsored an ordinance to name a city street "in honor" of a former chairman of the Black Panthers who advocated murdering police officers. Members of the radical group were responsible for the murders of 11 law enforcement officers, including 2 Chicago officers during his chairmanship, and the wounding of at least two dozen more. Provide your opinion directly to Ms. HaithcockHere is a list with links to dedications to the Police Officers Murdered by Black Panthers...  John Frey ~ Thomas Johnson ~ Charles Thomasson ~ Nelson Sasscer ~ Frank Rappaport ~ John Gilhooly ~ James Tackett ~ Glenn Smith ~ Kenneth Patrick ~ Daniel Faulkner ~ Ricky Kinchen END OF NOTE)

The City of New York honored her with a proclamation for inspiring "her peers, as well as adults, while also demonstrating the power of a father's love, the importance of education and the limitless boundaries of the human mind." New York City councilwoman Yvette Clark called her "one of the most precious young talents that this world has ever known."

Most recently, as New York Post education reporter David Andreatta reported this weekend, she was invited to perform at public middle and high schools in Peekskill, N.Y., for Black History Month.

Here, in full, is what precious little Autum -- groomed by her single father, Batin Ashante, a Nation of Islam
(Another Racist Hate Group) poet/activist -- spewed:

White Nationalism Put U In Bondage

White nationalism is what put you in bondage
Pirate and vampires like Columbus, Morgan, and Darwin
Drank the blood of the sheep, trampled all over them with
Steel, tricks and deceit.
Nothing has changed take a look in our streets
The mis-education of she and Hegro -- leaves you on your knee2grow
Black lands taken from your hands, by vampires with no remorse
They took the gold, the wisdom and all of the storytellers
They took the black women, with the black man weak
Made to watch as they changed the paradigm
Of our village
They killed the blind, they killed the lazy, they went
So far as to kill the unborn baby
Yeah White nationalism is what put you in bondage
Pirates and vampires like Columbus, Morgan, and Darwin
They drank the blood of the sheep, trampled all over them with
Steel laden feet, throw in the tricks alcohol and deceit.
Nothing has changed take a look at our streets. 

Autum's performance also included commanding White students to remain seated as she led black students in a recitation of the "Black Child's Pledge," by Black Panther Shirley Williams, which reads in part:

I pledge allegiance to my Black People.

I pledge to develop my mind and body to the greatest extent possible.

I will learn all that I can in order to give my best to my People in their struggle for liberation.

...I will discipline myself to direct my energies thoughtfully and constructively rather than wasting them in idle hatred.

I will train myself never to hurt or allow others to harm my Black brothers and sisters...

These principles I pledge to practice daily and to teach them to others in order to unite my People. 

Complaints from shocked students and parents led to a tape-recorded apology sent to all parents apologizing for the performance. Autum's father condemned White district officials as "racist crackers." Autum defended her poem by explaining to the Westchester Journal News that White people are "devils and they should be gone. We should be away from them and still be in Africa." 
  

And make note of this: The official who invited Autum to speak, Melvin Bolden, is a public school music teacher, Peekskill councilman and producer of her first spoken word album.

Who is surprised? 

If you set aside a separate holiday for Black History Month in the public schools, if you set aside separate graduation ceremonies, college dorms, academic departments, recruiting programs, and government contracts and subcontracts by race, you send a message that hard-core racial separatism is not only acceptable -- but desired.

Autum Ashante' is the natural offspring of militant multiculturalism and government-sanctioned identity politics. We reap what we sow. 


Excellent Article By Michelle Malkin

 


 

 

What Exactly IS Racism Anyway?

"What is Racism?"  By Thomas Jackson
   There is surely no nation in the world that holds "racism" in greater horror than does the United States. Compared to other kinds of offenses, it is thought to be somehow more reprehensible. The press and public have become so used to tales of murder, rape, robbery, and arson, that any but the most spectacular crimes are shrugged off as part of the inevitable texture of American life. "Racism" is never shrugged off. For example, when a white Georgetown Law School student reported earlier this year that black students are not as qualified as white students, it set off a booming, national controversy about "racism." If the student had merely murdered someone he would have attracted far less attention and criticism. Racism is, indeed, the national obsession.  Universities are on full alert for it, newspapers and politicians denounce it, churches preach against it, America is said to be racked with it, but just what is racism? 
Dictionaries are not much help in understanding what is meant by the word. They usually define it as the belief that one's own ethnic stock is superior to others, or as the belief that culture and behavior are rooted in race. When Americans speak of racism they mean a great deal more than this. 

Nevertheless, the dictionary definition of racism is a clue to understanding what Americans do mean. A peculiarly American meaning derives from the current dogma that all ethnic stocks are equal.

 Despite clear evidence to the contrary, all races have been declared to be equally talented and hard- working, and anyone who questions the dogma is thought to be not merely wrong but evil.

The dogma has logical consequences that are profoundly important.  If blacks, for example, are equal to whites in every way, what accounts for their poverty, criminality, and dissipation?   Since any theory of racial differences has been outlawed, the only possible explanation for black failure is white racism. And since blacks are markedly poor, crime-prone, and dissipated, America must be racked with pervasive racism. 

Nothing else could be keeping them in such an abject state. All public discourse on race today is locked into this rigid logic. 

Any explanation for black failure that does not depend on white wickedness threatens to veer off into the forbidden territory of racial differences.  Thus, even if today's whites can find in their hearts no desire to oppress blacks, yesterday's whites must have oppressed them.  If whites do not consciously oppress blacks, they must oppress them Un-consciously.  If no obviously racist individuals can be identified, then "institutions" must be racist.
Or, since blacks are failing so terribly in America, there simply must be millions of white people we do not know about, who are working day and night to keep blacks in misery... 

The dogma of racial equality leaves no room for an explanation of black failure that is not, in some fashion, an indictment of white people.

The logical consequences of this are clear. Since we are required to believe that the only explanation for non-white failure is white racism, every time a non-white is poor, commits a crime, goes on welfare, or takes drugs, white society stands accused of yet another act of racism. All failure or misbehavior by non-whites is standing proof that white society is riddled with hatred and bigotry. For precisely so long as non-whites fail to succeed in life at exactly the same level as whites, whites will be, by definition, thwarting and oppressing them. 

This obligatory pattern of thinking leads to strange conclusions. First of all, racism is a sin that is thought to be committed almost exclusively by white people. Indeed, a black congressman from Chicago, Gus Savage, and Coleman Young, the black mayor of Detroit, have argued that only white people "can" be racist.
Likewise, in 1987, the affirmative action officer of the State Insurance Fund of New York issued a company pamphlet in which she explained that "all" whites are racist and that "only" whites can be racist. How else could the plight of blacks be explained without flirting with the possibility of racial inequality? 

Although some blacks and liberal whites concede that non-whites can, perhaps, be racist, they invariably add that non-whites have been forced into it as self-defense because of centuries of white oppression. What appears to be non-white racism is so understandable and forgivable that it hardly deserves the name. Thus, whether or not an act is called racism depends on the race of the racist. 

What would surely be called racism when done by whites is thought to be normal when done by anyone else. The reverse is also true.

Examples of this sort of double standard are so common, it is almost tedious to list them: 

  • When a white man kills a black man and uses the word "nigger" while doing so, there is an enormous media uproar and the nation beats its collective breast; when members of the black Yahweh cult carry out ritual murders of random whites, the media are silent. 

  • College campuses forbid pejorative statements about non-whites as "racist," but ignore scurrilous attacks on whites.

  • At election time, if 60 percent of the white voters vote for a white candidate, and 95 percent of the black voters vote for the black opponent, it is white who are accused of racial bias. 

  • There are 107 "historically black" colleges, whose fundamental blackness must be preserved in the name of diversity, but all historically white colleges must be forcibly integrated in the name of... the same thing.

To resist would be racist...

  • "Black pride" is said to be a wonderful and worthy thing, but anything that could be construed as an expression of white pride is a form of hatred. 
  • It is perfectly natural for third-world immigrants to expect school instruction and driver's tests in their own languages, whereas for Native Americans to ask them to learn English is racist. 
  • Blatant anti-white prejudice, in the form of affirmative action, is now the law of the land. Anything remotely like affirmative action, if practiced in favor of whites, would be attacked as despicable favoritism.
  • All across the country, black, Hispanic, and Asian clubs and caucuses are thought to be fine expressions of ethnic solidarity, but any club or association expressly for whites is by definition racist.  At a few college campuses, students opposed to affirmative action have set up student unions for whites, analogous to those for blacks, Hispanics, etc, and have been roundly condemned as racists. Recently, when the white students at Lowell High School in San Francisco found themselves to be a minority, they asked for a racially exclusive club like the ones that non- whites have. They were turned down in horror.

Indeed, in America today, any club not specifically formed to be a white enclave but whose members simply happen all to be white is branded as racist.

Today, one of the favorite slogans that define the asymmetric quality of American racism is "celebration of diversity."    It has begun to dawn on a few people that "diversity" is always achieved at the expense of whites (and sometimes men), and never the other way around.

  • No one proposes that Howard University be made more diverse by admitting whites, Hispanics, or Asians. 
  • No one ever suggests that National Hispanic University in San Jose (CA) would benefit from the diversity of having non-Hispanics on campus. 
  • No one suggests that the Black Congressional Caucus or the executive ranks of the NAACP or the Mexican-American Legal Defense and Educational Fund suffer from a lack of diversity. 

Somehow, it is perfectly legitimate for them to celebrate "homogeneity." And yet any all-white group – a company, a town, a school, a club, a neighborhood - is thought to suffer from a crippling lack of diversity that must be remedied as quickly as possible. 

Only when whites have been reduced to a minority has "diversity" been achieved.

Let us put it bluntly: To "celebrate" or "embrace" diversity, as we are so often asked to do, is no different from "deploring an excess of whites."

In fact, the entire nation is thought to suffer from an excess of whites. Our current immigration policies are structured so that approximately 90 percent of our annual 800,000 legal immigrants are non-white. The several million illegal immigrants that enter the country every year are virtually all non-white.

  It would be racist not to be grateful for this laudable contribution to "diversity."

It is, of course, only white nations that are called upon to practice this kind of "diversity." It is almost criminal to imagine a nation of any other race countenancing blatant dispossession of this kind. 


What if the United States were pouring its poorest, least educated citizens across the border into Mexico? Could anyone be fooled into thinking that Mexico was being "culturally enriched?" What if the state of Chihuahua were losing its majority population to poor whites who demanded that schools be taught in English, who insisted on celebrating the Fourth of July, who demanded the right to vote even if they weren't citizens, who clamored for "affirmative action" in jobs and schooling?


Would Mexico - or any other nation - tolerate this kind of cultural and demographic depredation? 

Of course not. Yet European-Americans are supposed to look upon the flood of Hispanics and Asians entering their country as a priceless cultural gift. 

They are supposed to "celebrate" their own loss of influence, their own dwindling numbers, their own dispossession, for to do otherwise would be hopelessly racist.

There is another curious asymmetry about American racism. When non-whites advance their own racial purposes, no one ever accuses them of "hating" another group. Blacks can join "civil rights" groups and Hispanics can be activists without fear of being branded as bigots and hate mongers. They can agitate openly for racial preferences that can come only at the expense of whites.

They can demand preferential treatment of all kinds without anyone ever suggesting that they are "anti-white."

Whites, on the other hand, need only express their opposition to affirmative action to be called haters. They need only subject racial policies that are clearly prejudicial to themselves to be called racists. Should they actually go so far as to say that they prefer the company of their own kind, that they wish to be left alone to enjoy the fruits of their European heritage, they are irredeemably wicked and hateful.
Here, then is the final, baffling inconsistency about American race relations. All non-whites are allowed to prefer the company of their own kind, to think of themselves as groups with interests distinct from those of the whole, and to work openly for group advantage. 

None of this is thought to be racist.

At the same time, "whites" must "also" champion the racial interests of non-whites. 

They must sacrifice their own future on the altar of "diversity" and cooperate in their own dispossession. They are to encourage, even to subsidize, the displacement of a European people and culture by alien peoples and cultures. To put it in the simplest possible terms, white people are cheerfully to slaughter their own society, to commit racial and cultural suicide.

To refuse to do so would be racism...

 

Of course, the entire non-white enterprise in the United States is perfectly natural and healthy. Nothing could be more natural than to love one's people and to hope that it should flourish. Filipinos and El Salvadorans are doubtless astonished to discover that simply by setting foot in the United States they are entitled to affirmative action preferences over native-born whites, but can they be blamed for accepting them?

Is it surprising that they should want their languages, their cultures, their brothers and sisters to take possession and put their mark indelibly on the land? 

If the once-great people of a once-great nation is bent upon self-destruction and is prepared to hand over land and power to whomever shows up and asks for it, why should Mexicans and Cambodians complain?

No, it is the white enterprise in the United States that is unnatural, unhealthy, and without historical precedent. Whites have let themselves be convinced that it is racist merely to object to dispossession, much less to work for their own interests.

Never in the history of the world has a dominant people thrown open the gates to strangers, and poured out its wealth to aliens. Never before has a people been fooled into thinking that there was virtue or nobility in surrendering its heritage, and giving away to others its place in history. Of all the races in America, only whites have been tricked into thinking that a preference for one's own kind is racism. Only whites are ever told that a love for their own people is somehow "hatred" of others. All healthy people prefer the company of their own kind, and it has nothing to do with hatred. All men love their families more than their neighbors, but this does not mean that they hate their neighbors. Whites who love their racial family need bear no ill will towards non-whites. 

They only wish to be left alone to participate in the unfolding of their racial and cultural destinies.

What whites in America are being asked to do is therefore utterly unnatural. They are being asked to devote themselves to the interests of other races and to ignore the interests of their own. This is like asking a man to forsake his own children and love the children of his neighbors, since to do otherwise would be "racist."

What then, is "racism?"

(It is considerably more than any dictionary is likely to say.)

"It is any opposition by whites to official policies of racial preference for non-whites. It is any preference by whites for their own people and culture. It is any resistance by whites to the idea of becoming a minority people. It is any unwillingness to be pushed aside. It is, in short, any of the normal aspirations of "people-hood" that have defined nations since the beginning of history - but it is only racism so long as the aspirations are those of whites."

By Thomas Jackson "What Is Racism?" was originally published in American Renaissance, 
Vol 2, No. 8., P.O. Box 527, Oakton, VA 22124

 

**************************

 

"White Boy" Comment Draws Ire of Black Conservatives
By Randy Hall
CNSNews.com Staff Writer/Editor
August 10, 2005

(CNSNews.com) - Conservative African Americans Tuesday slammed liberal black activist Dick Gregory for referring to a Cybercast News Service reporter as a "white boy" during a nationally televised cable news program Monday night. Gregory later apologized for the remark.

The exchange took place during the "Hannity & Colmes" program on the Fox News Channel. Gregory and Cybercast News Service Senior Staff Writer Marc Morano discussed comments Gregory made during an Aug. 6 march in Atlanta commemorating the 40th anniversary of the signing of the Voting Rights Act.

Reading from Morano's article, co-host Sean Hannity asked Gregory to confirm whether he had made a number of controversial remarks during the event.

The activist readily acknowledged that he had referred to Republicans as "white racist thugs" and called the United States "the most dishonest, ungodly, unspiritual nation that ever existed in the history of the planet."

But, when Gregory hesitated in his responses, Hannity turned to Morano for confirmation.

"You don't have to confirm what I said," Gregory charged. "I've already said it. So I don't need no white boy to come on and say yes, he said it."

Surprised by Gregory's reply, Hannity repeated, "No white boy? No white boy?" and asked Gregory if he wanted to apologize to Morano for calling him a racially charged term.

"Yes, I apologize for it," Gregory replied.

"Well, I was already called a black tyrant by [Harry] Belafonte yesterday, so I welcome whatever Mr. Gregory wants to call me," Morano said in response.

While the rest of the interview went amicably, leaders of two black conservative organizations Tuesday were sharply critical of Gregory's remarks -- both during the interview and at the earlier event in Atlanta.

Rev. Jesse Lee Peterson, founder and president of the Brotherhood Organization for a New Destiny (BOND), said the reaction to Gregory's "white boy" comment showed that America has a double standard in this area of race relations.

"Just imagine what would have happened if Morano had called Gregory a 'black boy,'" Peterson said. "They'd be protesting Cybercast News Service and Fox News Channel, calling for the heads of the presidents of these organizations.

"But because Dick Gregory said it to a white man, it's okay," Peterson said.

He added that "we have a double standard in this country today, where black liberals can do and say whatever they want" because whites "have allowed themselves to be intimidated" by the fear of being called racists.

Mychal Massie, a radio talk show host and member of the black conservative group Project 21, agreed with Peterson, telling Cybercast News Service that Gregory's remarks provided "an unambiguous display of overt black racism."

Massie's disdain extended to the Atlanta event, which he called "a pep rally for hatred." He was also critical of many of the participants, including U.S. Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.), Rev. Jesse Jackson, U.S. Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.), actor Greg Mathis and singer/actor Harry Belafonte.

"Combined, these people have a greater aggregate income than some third-world countries," Massie said. "How has America hurt them? How have they been injured by what's taking place in America? And where are their ideas and solutions?"

Peterson also criticized what he called the "so-called rally" in Atlanta to extend the Voting Rights Act.

"Whether this act is confirmed in 2007 is not going to make a difference whether blacks go out to vote," he said. "Blacks aren't voting -- not because of the lack of opportunity -- they're not voting because there's too much apathy."

Peterson charged that the real purpose of the event was for groups like the NAACP and the AFL-CIO to begin a campaign for the 2008 presidential election. He also claimed its organizers "have used racism to fatten their pockets and maintain power. And now, they're going broke. They're desperate to get back in power."

Gregory is also a hypocrite, according to Peterson, for castigating the United States while enjoying a successful career here. "Dick Gregory has done better in this country than he would have done anywhere else in the world," Peterson said. "I'd like to know where he could go and be able to do what he has done here."

Massie added that he believes the event was entirely unnecessary